From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 21 18:18:16 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C9B116A4CE for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 18:18:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 632FC43D41 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 18:18:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from swhetzel@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so922447wri for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 10:18:14 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=tQYstJkiOdmJwiM7gzgTbxNRfcBHC1GgX1GoKtFe4It9uxuJVjsSBTKQpm8U/b3os3e0wNUdspuPagpVeUxuGs32OUWd65alLRHpckO6XFl2gPSLjdXfBEbT6+SslZHueZN6x8uGd/ZEFwyM6pJHrG0ZgfbzXG2TZOBCTyjHwy0= Received: by 10.54.6.3 with SMTP id 3mr3694wrf; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 10:18:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.29.8 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 10:18:13 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <790a9fff050221101869ce8fa5@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 12:18:13 -0600 From: Scot Hetzel To: =?UTF-8?Q?Zbyn=C4=9Bk_Burget?= In-Reply-To: <42144C43.1000304@miastudio.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable References: <42144C43.1000304@miastudio.cz> cc: ports@freebsd.org cc: atamaniuk-ports@frobs.net Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: lilypond-2.2.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Scot Hetzel List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 18:18:16 -0000 On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 08:48:19 +0100, Zbyn=C4=9Bk Burget wrote: > Hi, > I've a question - how is it with work on lilypond port for FreeBSD? > In t port collection are broken versions of lilypond (and correction for > version 2.2.2 is very simply) > Development version of lilypond is "scheduled to be removed on > 2005-02-18 if it is still broken at that time, and a fix has not been > submitted to GNATS" > From November 2004 exists new stable version of lilypond, but isn't in > port collection... >=20 > Lilypond is best software for music typesetting and FreeBSD is best OS. >=20 > Can I someway help with porting of new versions of lilypond? >=20 It looks like the current maintainer last updated these ports 8 months ago. So go ahead and download the current version. Modify lilypond port to use the latest version (2.4.4), and then submit a diff file with the changes using send-pr. Also, send a message to the maintainer with the PR number. If after several weeks he hasn't responded, ask here again to have a comitter comit the PR for the port due to maintainer timeout (you could also ask at that time to take over maintainer ship). You could also resurrect the lilypond-devel port, by updating it to 2.5.12, and then sending a gzipped tar file of the port in another PR. Scot