From owner-freebsd-ia64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 28 15:48:01 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ia64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E27E192 for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 15:48:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirg.bris.ac.uk (dirg.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1713CD33 for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 15:48:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ncsc.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.41]) by dirg.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UB5i5-0001Uh-Ui for freebsd-ia64@freebsd.org; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 15:47:53 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by ncsc.bris.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UB5i5-0006bU-EZ for freebsd-ia64@freebsd.org; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 15:47:53 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r1SFlrrM052137 for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 15:47:53 GMT (envelope-from mexas@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) id r1SFlrSb052136 for freebsd-ia64@freebsd.org; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 15:47:53 GMT (envelope-from mexas) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 15:47:53 GMT From: Anton Shterenlikht Message-Id: <201302281547.r1SFlrSb052136@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> To: freebsd-ia64@freebsd.org Subject: ispfw(4) in GENERIC? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ia64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: mexas@bristol.ac.uk List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the IA-64 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 15:48:01 -0000 Hi Marcel isp(4) is in GENERIC, but not ispfw(4). The isp(4) man page says: It is strongly recommended that you use the firmware available from ispfw(4) as it is the most likely to have been tested with this driver. So should ispfw be in GENERIC too? Thanks Anton P.S. Thanks for fixing ia64/169926: [ia64] netstat -r: kvm_read: Bad address