From owner-freebsd-stable Mon May 15 8:11:52 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from BSDpc.geek4food.org (adsl-216-103-105-71.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [216.103.105.71]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5397337B7C8 for ; Mon, 15 May 2000 08:11:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from andy@geek4food.org) Received: from mega.geek4food.org (mega.geek4food.org [192.168.1.57]) by BSDpc.geek4food.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06339459; Mon, 15 May 2000 08:11:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mega.geek4food.org (localhost.geek4food.org [127.0.0.1]) by mega.geek4food.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA17794; Mon, 15 May 2000 08:11:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from andy@geek4food.org) Message-Id: <200005151511.IAA17794@mega.geek4food.org> To: jon@welearn.com.au Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: curious about memory report usingfreebsd v3.3-release In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 15 May 2000 18:12:49 +1000." <20000515181246.A48481@phoenix.welearn.com.au> Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 08:11:46 -0700 From: Andy Sparrow Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Your message dated: Mon, 15 May 2000 18:12:49 +1000 >that is what i thought and so i purchased a intel eepro .. only >to find i got one of teh "new microsoftised ones" with the ake >on lan cable and all that other paraphenalia. thier was some >mention of a 'problem' in teh firmware that make it hard to >have two of these cards on teh same segment. This used to be true, the cards would come up with an unrecognised PHY message and the same MAC address. However, DG spliced in the required changes to support this card around about 3/28, since which time it's been working perfectly for me :-) Cheers, AS To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message