From owner-freebsd-current Sat Jun 15 13:21:38 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id NAA13714 for current-outgoing; Sat, 15 Jun 1996 13:21:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de (irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de [141.76.1.11]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id NAA13704 for ; Sat, 15 Jun 1996 13:21:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sax.sax.de by irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de (8.6.12/8.6.12-s1) with ESMTP id WAA14254 for ; Sat, 15 Jun 1996 22:21:17 +0200 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by sax.sax.de (8.6.12/8.6.12-s1) with UUCP id WAA14181 for freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 15 Jun 1996 22:21:17 +0200 Received: (from j@localhost) by uriah.heep.sax.de (8.7.5/8.6.9) id WAA20827 for freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 15 Jun 1996 22:05:12 +0200 (MET DST) From: J Wunsch Message-Id: <199606152005.WAA20827@uriah.heep.sax.de> Subject: Re: ktrace [Was: 2.2-960612-SNAP resolver problems] To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org (FreeBSD-current users) Date: Sat, 15 Jun 1996 22:05:12 +0200 (MET DST) Reply-To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) In-Reply-To: <199606151633.KAA24752@rocky.sri.MT.net> from Nate Williams at "Jun 15, 96 10:33:59 am" X-Phone: +49-351-2012 669 X-PGP-Fingerprint: DC 47 E6 E4 FF A6 E9 8F 93 21 E0 7D F9 12 D6 4E X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL17 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk As Nate Williams wrote: > > I wonder whether we should turn on ktrace by default. > > Earlier on, people were having problems that were solved by removing > KTRACE from their config file. Except of a recent brokeness in -current (that only affected people actually using it), i cannot remember such problems. I used to have it in my config file for several months if not years now. gzip used to be absolutely broken for quite a longer period of time, and nobody complained that it was still in the GENERIC config file. :) Does anybody seriously object against putting it into GENERIC? (I will see whether it causes problems for the BOOTMFS kernel, but it can always be avoided there without too much trouble.) -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)