From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 11 15:28:27 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8699737B401 for ; Mon, 11 Aug 2003 15:28:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-64-169-107-97.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [64.169.107.97]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC9AA43FAF for ; Mon, 11 Aug 2003 15:28:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [10.0.0.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 742EA66B9B; Mon, 11 Aug 2003 15:28:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4F7E97A8; Mon, 11 Aug 2003 15:28:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 15:28:26 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Andy Farkas Message-ID: <20030811222826.GA43776@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <200308111816.26818.eqe@cox.net> <20030812082147.A85046-100000@hewey.af.speednet.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030812082147.A85046-100000@hewey.af.speednet.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: Eriq Lamar Subject: Re: smp in 5.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 22:28:27 -0000 --7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 08:25:38AM +1000, Andy Farkas wrote: > On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Eriq Lamar wrote: >=20 > > Is there any advantage in 5.1 over 4.8 for two amd mp's. and if so could > > someone tell what they are. I am interested in building dual system usi= ng > > mp's but not sure which version would be better. >=20 > Scheduling in 5.1 is broken (sched_ule doesn't even work*). >=20 > Stick with 4.8. >=20 >=20 > * for me, sched_ule completely locks up my box, no ping, no keybd. Exact > same kernel with sched_4bsd works fine. Erm, this in itself isn't a reason to avoid 5.1, since as you noted "sched_4bsd works fine". Kris --7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/OBiKWry0BWjoQKURAiCuAJwPNg4R3M+/hgYE4k0KjpomTePb9wCg5nHW bxtVHzadadKRFraAat2BJmE= =l1R1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH--