From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 20:26:19 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D02B16A4CE; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 20:26:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pd4mo3so.prod.shaw.ca (shawidc-mo1.cg.shawcable.net [24.71.223.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9EB443D5C; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 20:26:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk) Received: from pd4mr3so.prod.shaw.ca (pd4mr3so-qfe3.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.141.214]) by l-daemon (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0I9P00KAJI3ULZ60@l-daemon>; Sun, 02 Jan 2005 13:26:18 -0700 (MST) Received: from pn2ml3so.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.121.147]) by pd4mr3so.prod.shaw.ca (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0I9P005G6I3UG8M0@pd4mr3so.prod.shaw.ca>; Sun, 02 Jan 2005 13:26:18 -0700 (MST) Received: from [192.168.0.60] (S0106006067227a4a.vc.shawcable.net [24.87.233.42])2003)) with ESMTP id <0I9P00L8LI3TY6@l-daemon>; Sun, 02 Jan 2005 13:26:18 -0700 (MST) Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 12:26:16 -0800 From: Colin Percival In-reply-to: <200501022117.48924.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> To: Michael Nottebrock Message-id: <41D858E8.5080609@wadham.ox.ac.uk> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Accept-Language: en-us, en X-Enigmail-Version: 0.86.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime References: <200501022117.48924.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (X11/20041107) cc: harti@freebsd.org cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ports failing with bsd make X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 20:26:19 -0000 Michael Nottebrock wrote: > On recent -current, several ports are failing to build. Common quality: They > all use the system make rather than gmake. > >[snip] > > Looks like they're all failing while trying to generate manpages. Has make > become allergic to targets with a dot in them perhaps? Are you sure this isn't fallout from the NOMAN/NO_MAN change? Colin Percival