From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 15 13:41:49 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3404E106568A; Wed, 15 Oct 2008 13:41:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mex@active.sk) Received: from s1.active.sk (ns.active.sk [217.67.25.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDBDC8FC21; Wed, 15 Oct 2008 13:41:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mex@active.sk) Received: from localhost (localhost.active.sk [127.0.0.1]) by s1.active.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 205CB5C270; Wed, 15 Oct 2008 15:27:29 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at active.sk Received: from s1.active.sk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.active.sk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d6QKqFu7j7WS; Wed, 15 Oct 2008 15:27:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.active.sk (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by s1.active.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5BB85C267; Wed, 15 Oct 2008 15:27:26 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <6bb891ca5bbd9ba095a5fa61e1b8e3cd.squirrel@mail.active.sk> In-Reply-To: <20081015131546.GA78192@icarus.home.lan> References: <8f82c35c0810150532o52ae50b5kef7c685fd23a0af4@mail.gmail.com> <20081015131546.GA78192@icarus.home.lan> Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 15:27:26 +0200 (CEST) From: "MeX" To: "Jeremy Chadwick" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RAID 5 - serious problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: mex@active.sk List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 13:41:49 -0000 Hello, On Str, Október 15, 2008 15:15, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > Are you using the Matrix Storage Technology? If so, immediately stop. > FreeBSD's support for this is very, very bad, and will nearly guarantee > data loss. There are many of us who have tried it, and it's known to > be buggy on FreeBSD. > > http://wiki.freebsd.org/JeremyChadwick/ATA_issues_and_troubleshooting > > I recommend you stop using this feature and start using ZFS or gvinum > for what you need. do you think that ZFS code in FreeBSD 7.0-R (7.1-R) is enough stable for using it in production environment for RAID-1 even also for RAID-5? About 5 years ago I tried vinum for RAID1 if I remember clearly, but I never tried gvinum. It's production ready piece of cake? Many thanks MeX