From owner-freebsd-current  Sat Nov 15 08:42:24 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id IAA17086
          for current-outgoing; Sat, 15 Nov 1997 08:42:24 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current)
Received: from conductor.synapse.net (conductor.synapse.net [199.84.54.18])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id IAA17079
          for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Sat, 15 Nov 1997 08:42:21 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from evanc@synapse.net)
Received: (qmail 29776 invoked from network); 15 Nov 1997 16:42:18 -0000
Received: from cello.synapse.net (199.84.54.81)
  by conductor.synapse.net with SMTP; 15 Nov 1997 16:42:18 -0000
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 1997 11:42:17 -0500 (EST)
From: Evan Champion <evanc@synapse.net>
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: bcopy via npx not in 686 version?
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.971115113404.220N-100000@cello.synapse.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

I was just looking through LINT and came upon the npx0 options to optimize
bcopy/bzero/copyin/copyout.  These seem to be the only 586-specific
options in FreeBSD (Everything else is ifdef'd for both 586 and 686).

I'm just curious if this was the desired behaviour, or if it was
accidently left out?

Evan