From owner-freebsd-current Wed Jun 24 14:12:00 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA29896 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Wed, 24 Jun 1998 14:12:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from puck.nether.net (jared@puck.nether.net [204.42.254.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA29797 for ; Wed, 24 Jun 1998 14:11:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jared@puck.nether.net) Received: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.9.0/8.7.3) id RAA05027; Wed, 24 Jun 1998 17:11:15 -0400 Message-ID: <19980624171115.B4790@puck.nether.net> Date: Wed, 24 Jun 1998 17:11:15 -0400 From: Jared Mauch To: Bill Fenner Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Problems w/ IMCP sockets References: <19980623232240.A21485@puck.nether.net> <199806241736.KAA07821@mango.parc.xerox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.91.1i In-Reply-To: <199806241736.KAA07821@mango.parc.xerox.com>; from Bill Fenner on Wed, Jun 24, 1998 at 10:36:51AM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I've got as many as 200 sockets open doing active pings. Can you test with that many? I'm using 0520-SNAP w/SMP, and also 2.2.5 non-smp I get this with both. - Jared On Wed, Jun 24, 1998 at 10:36:51AM -0700, Bill Fenner wrote: > Can you give more specifics? On a 2.2.6 system, I opened 75 raw > ICMP sockets and set SO_RCVBUF to 200Kbytes on each, and then > initiated a flood ping so that I'd get lots and lots of ICMP. I > don't know if 75 is "many, many" or if 200Kbytes is "too high", > and I don't know what OS version you experienced this on, but > nothing untoward happened during my test. > > Bill -- Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from jared@puck.nether.net Nether Net | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message