From owner-freebsd-isp  Mon Jun 14 14: 5:15 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
Received: from karon.elanders.no (karon.elanders.no [194.143.3.10])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4923214DA2
	for <freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 14 Jun 1999 14:05:06 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from berenmls@saers.com)
Received: by karon.elanders.no; id WAA07015; Mon, 14 Jun 1999 22:58:33 +0200 (CEST)
Message-Id: <4.1.19990614224359.00a0b318@pop.saers.com>
X-Sender: berenmls@pop.saers.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1 
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 1999 22:46:15 +0200
To: "Gary Palmer" <Gary.Palmer@RCN.COM>
From: Niklas Saers <berenmls@saers.com>
Subject: Re: Sendmail 
Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <32720.929294925@noop.colo.erols.net>
References: <Your message of "Sun, 13 Jun 1999 11:15:06 +0200."             <4.1.19990613111339.01fa8ad0@pop.saers.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

>That just opens you up to unauthorized relaying, except that you make
>the spammer make it look like it comes from your domain (on the from
>line) which would just make people think that its authorized.

This sounds WAAAY to black-and-white for me. :-I How have you ISP's out
there solved the smtp-problem? How do your users use SMTP?

>Also, places like ORBS check for that form of `relay protection' and
>will list you if you allow it.

I know. I like spam-protection, but this is to much for my taste!

>relaying. Unfortunately, authenticated SMTP (by far the best solution)
>isn't all that widespread yet, and I don't know any freeware programs
>that come with AuthSMTP built in. Sendmail doesn't have it yet,
>although Eric says it will be in the next rev (I believe)

Do mail-clients use AuthSMTP?? What are the alternatives to using sendmail,
anyway?

	Niklas


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message