From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Sep  4 21:30:39 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48306106566C;
	Thu,  4 Sep 2008 21:30:39 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from david@vizion2000.net)
Received: from dns1.vizion2000.net
	(77-99-36-42.cable.ubr04.chap.blueyonder.co.uk [77.99.36.42])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 002048FC0A;
	Thu,  4 Sep 2008 21:30:38 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from david@vizion2000.net)
Received: by dns1.vizion2000.net (Postfix, from userid 1007)
	id 20E591CC61; Thu,  4 Sep 2008 14:54:12 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Southwell <david@vizion2000.net>
Organization: Voice and Vision
To: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@freebsd.org>,
 freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 14:54:11 -0700
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10
References: <200809011300.48256.david@vizion2000.net>
	<200809040801.48343.david@vizion2000.net>
	<48C00EFE.9050502@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <48C00EFE.9050502@FreeBSD.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200809041454.11916.david@vizion2000.net>
Cc: 
Subject: Re: Portupgrade has serious problems
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2008 21:30:39 -0000

On Thursday 04 September 2008 09:38:22 you wrote:
> David Southwell wrote:
> > On Tuesday 02 September 2008 08:26:26 you wrote:
> >> Show please an output of the command:
> >> pkg_info -o apache-2.2.9
> >
> > Following up this one here is another weirdo::
> > ttp://httpd.apache.org/
> > ===>  Cleaning for apache-2.2.9_5
> > --->  Cleaning out obsolete shared libraries
> > [Updating the pkgdb <format:bdb_btree> in /var/db/pkg ... - 1047 packages
> > found (-0 +1) . done]
> > --->  Skipping 'bsdpan-Term-ReadLine-Perl-1.0302' because it is held by
> > user (specify -f to force)
> > --->  Skipping 'devel/p5-IO' because it is held by user (specify -f to
> > force) --->  Skipping 'graphics/ImageMagick' (ImageMagick-6.4.3.4)
> > because a requisite package 'apache-2.2.9_3' () failed (specify -k to
> > force) --->  Skipping 'bsdpan-Shell-0.72' because it is held by user
> > (specify -f to force)
> > --->  Skipping 'misc/p5-Array-Compare' because it is held by user
> > (specify -f to force)
> > --->  Skipping 'devel/p5-Devel-Symdump' because it is held by user
> > (specify -f to force)
> > ** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed)
> >
> >
> > Here we have another example of portupgrade gets its dependencies in a
> > twist.
> >
> > Not install Image-Magick on the grounds that apache, which it has just
> > upgraded does not have the previous version installed.
> >
> > This is a constant repeat of the same problem as has happened with kde
> > and elsewjhere
>
> Just again. Show pkg_info -o apache-2.2.9_5 please.
Here is output..

But how does it help?
Having installed the upgradefrom apache-2.2.9_3 to 2.2.9_5 the database 
naturally shows the result of upgrading the database. Is it not more about 
what version portupgrade is expecting to find? Having upgraded why dhould it 
expect to find  apache-2.2.9_3????

root@dns1 /usr/home/david]# pkg_info -o apache*
Information for apache-2.2.9_5:

Origin:
www/apache22

Information for apache-ant-1.7.0_2:

Origin:
devel/apache-ant