From owner-cvs-all Mon Jul 5 14:21:24 1999 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (castles530.castles.com [208.214.165.94]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B3C5150EC; Mon, 5 Jul 1999 14:21:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (LOCALHOST [127.0.0.1]) by dingo.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA14669; Mon, 5 Jul 1999 14:17:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Message-Id: <199907052117.OAA14669@dingo.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Soren Schmidt Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/linux linux_misc.c In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 05 Jul 1999 22:57:24 +0200." <199907052057.WAA55841@freebsd.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 05 Jul 1999 14:17:16 -0700 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > > > I think the main point was that you made the change w/o asking. Th= is > > > issue has been desided in the past. > > = > > I've been discussing this with Mike and the outcome was that it was b= etter > > to return Linux. > = > Erhm, although mike is a sharp guy, you should not listen to much > to him :), no, really, you should have asked a wider audience, maybe > not hackers (to much religion there) but at least a handfull of > people and involving a couble of -core members wouldn't hurt either... > = > But for this time, leave it be, the few points we could score by > sending FreeBSD rather than Linux isn't going to save our ass > anyhow, so.... I actually get the pointy hat for this; I thought the discussion that = Marcel and I had was copied to -emulation. Checking my archives proved = me wrong on that; so mea culpa. I thought we'd already been over this = and hashed it all out, wheras we hadn't. Basically, if we're going to be "compatible", we need to consider that = as an absolute; tweaking website stats (not necessarily a bad thing) is = something that's nice but not worth sacrificing the accuracy of our = compatability for. Right off the top of my head, not returning "Linux" breaks everything = that uses RPM and every "portable" shell script that we don't actively = patch. The issue with RPM really becomes significant since Marcel's = work commits us to looking as much like RedHat as possible (for better = or worse), and this means that RPM has to work "just so". Again, my apologies that this context wasn't available before the = commit. -- = \\ The mind's the standard \\ Mike Smith \\ of the man. \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ -- Joseph Merrick \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message