From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Feb 19 1:11:30 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAD9537B400 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2002 01:11:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1192) id B72B2AE343; Tue, 19 Feb 2002 01:11:27 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 01:11:27 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein To: Erik Trulsson Cc: Pankaj , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: make in freebsd Message-ID: <20020219091127.GM12136@elvis.mu.org> References: <20020219093450.A13798@sarai.net> <20020219090609.GA81036@student.uu.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020219090609.GA81036@student.uu.se> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Erik Trulsson [020219 01:06] wrote: > > One potential problem is that 'make' on different platforms can differ > in many details. > Some of the features of BSD make that are used by the portmakefiles for > example are not supported by GNU make (which is used on Linux) GNU make > OTOH supports some things not in BSD make. > > Writing complicated makefiles that are portable between different > 'make' implementations is a non-trivial task. Yes, but both BSD and GNU make are fairly portable so it's not that big of a problem. -Alfred To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message