From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 23 16:20:26 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C69D607; Fri, 23 May 2014 16:20:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-x22a.google.com (mail-wg0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 928892D59; Fri, 23 May 2014 16:20:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f42.google.com with SMTP id y10so4942215wgg.25 for ; Fri, 23 May 2014 09:20:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Bl+8lJoyNPx9ep72zmMmh6L6XSiSogRWczH26AZWGYE=; b=PZRvKzAmFdJ+gSsIci49REAo1SJIi+olkhzhY6LZlqRCsVZ/aBUDexFbhCSjbez5Y/ GCRJc2eK2HKPM2OxlvoxcLAHNXpZe2kOPsmWI7YuGMGXxndPAc653Ug/HeCYKuj571qr 4DSYpsN84qfgXGwVt2Sau9rwd9gKGfqgfxAbQSeOfMVPWWZRHFQu94zsysPTdtqBA7rI aaipy6C1xGoY/Q1oNFrS63vVzv+Pyx7ibuSZJBx5BaY5LVucfLPxMrLLi5Qr/f6I2kyq pDHnHmBTw479LEhAPFUWsp2kyAO0djaissNWqwuObv+ayWZW2YBvrDb8IB4cNRaa4Dcg yL8Q== X-Received: by 10.180.206.163 with SMTP id lp3mr4163148wic.29.1400862023793; Fri, 23 May 2014 09:20:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id wu6sm4429452wjb.46.2014.05.23.09.20.22 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 23 May 2014 09:20:22 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 18:20:20 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Nathan Whitehorn Subject: Re: svn commit: r266553 - head/release/scripts Message-ID: <20140523162020.GG72340@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <201405221922.s4MJM4Y9025265@svn.freebsd.org> <537F6706.6070509@freebsd.org> <20140523153619.GF72340@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <537F6EBC.3080008@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5UGlQXeG3ziZS81+" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <537F6EBC.3080008@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, Glen Barber , svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 16:20:26 -0000 --5UGlQXeG3ziZS81+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 08:52:28AM -0700, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > On 05/23/14 08:36, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 08:19:34AM -0700, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > >> Is there any chance of finally switching the pkg abi identifiers to ju= st > >> be uname -p? > >> -Nathan > > Keeping asking won't make it happen, I have explained a large number of= time why it > > happened, why it is not easy for compatibility and why uname -p is stil= l not > > representing the ABI we do support, and what flexibility we need that t= he > > current string offers to us. > > > > if one is willing to do the work, please be my guess, just dig into the= archives > > and join the pkg development otherwise: no it won't happen before a whi= le > > because we have way too much work on the todo and this item is stored a= t the > > very end of this todo. > > > > regards, > > Bapt >=20 > I'm happy to do the work, and have volunteered now many times. If uname= =20 > -p does not describe the ABI fully, then uname -p needs changes on the=20 > relevant platforms. Which are they? What extra flexibility does the=20 > string give you if uname -p describes the ABI completely? > -Nathan just simple examples in armv6: - eabi vs oabi - The different float abi (even if only one is supported for now others are being worked on) - little endian vs big endian the extras flexibilit is being able to say this binary do support freebsd i= 386 and amd64 in one key, freebsd:9:x86:*, or or all arches freebsd:10:* regards, Bapt --5UGlQXeG3ziZS81+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlN/dUQACgkQ8kTtMUmk6Eyk6gCfUQMn/SJJYKW0+3IQGTEDsSlg o38AoLt6koQisAcV7cnF0BoXUhIqU233 =iaZc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5UGlQXeG3ziZS81+--