From owner-cvs-all Mon Jun 26 14: 2:46 2000 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFC1A37B981; Mon, 26 Jun 2000 14:02:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from green@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 17:02:39 -0400 (EDT) From: Brian Fundakowski Feldman X-Sender: green@green.dyndns.org To: David O'Brien Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/crypto/openssh canohost.c ssh.h sshd.c In-Reply-To: <20000626005246.A11096@dragon.nuxi.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 26 Jun 2000, David O'Brien wrote: > On Sun, Jun 25, 2000 at 10:44:23PM -0700, Brian Feldman wrote: > > Modified files: > > crypto/openssh canohost.c ssh.h sshd.c > > Log: > > Make rate limiting work per-listening-socket. Log better messages than > > before for this, requiring a new function (get_ipaddr()). canohost.c > > receives a $FreeBSD$ line. > > > > Suggested by: Niels Provos > > > > Revision Changes Path > > 1.2 +41 -11 src/crypto/openssh/canohost.c > ^^^^^ > > You've taken this off the vendor branch. Are you *sure* you could not > get Niels to make the same change in their code and do a vendor import? You're most likely right about that. Pardon my ignorance, but what is the actual harm done by taking another file off the vendor branch, this one being only a couple hundred lines? I thought that it was only because the file would be duplicated in the repository. > -- > -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) -- Brian Fundakowski Feldman \ FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! / green@FreeBSD.org `------------------------------' To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message