From owner-freebsd-current Fri Oct 18 07:29:35 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id HAA26118 for current-outgoing; Fri, 18 Oct 1996 07:29:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dfw-ix5.ix.netcom.com (dfw-ix5.ix.netcom.com [206.214.98.5]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id HAA26100 for ; Fri, 18 Oct 1996 07:29:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (ala-ca11-27.ix.netcom.com [199.35.209.187]) by dfw-ix5.ix.netcom.com (8.6.13/8.6.12) with ESMTP id HAA17736; Fri, 18 Oct 1996 07:28:58 -0700 Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.7.6/8.6.9) id HAA18892; Fri, 18 Oct 1996 07:28:55 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 18 Oct 1996 07:28:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199610181428.HAA18892@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: michaelh@cet.co.jp CC: current@freebsd.org In-reply-to: (message from Michael Hancock on Fri, 18 Oct 1996 11:25:31 +0900 (JST)) Subject: Re: Iozone: local vs nfs drives From: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi Asami) Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk * > I haven't seen tagged-queueing make much difference for reads. These * > are the kind of numbers we've seen before (off the top of my head): * > * > w/o tag with tag * > W R W R * > Quantum Atlas 6 7 6 7 * > Seagate 'Cuda 4 6 6 7 * * I guess we haven't addressed the original question though. It's strange, You're right, I've never seen any drive that can write faster than reading. At least in my limited experience with, um, 5 drives and two controllers. Satoshi P.S. Here's another one, this is IDE (P5-133, ST32140A): ## iozone 100 65536 : 3236501 bytes/second for writing the file 3689327 bytes/second for reading the file