From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 15:24:15 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7872F8F for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 15:24:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from astart2.astart.com (108-248-95-193.lightspeed.sndgca.sbcglobal.net [108.248.95.193]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46FC1DA7 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 15:24:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop_93.private (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by astart2.astart.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t0DFODrN025093 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 07:24:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from papowell@astart.com) Message-ID: <54B5389D.2020708@astart.com> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 07:24:13 -0800 From: Patrick Powell Reply-To: papowell@astart.com Organization: Astart Technologies User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option References: <20150111235449.A14AEF52@hub.freebsd.org> <20150112040129.GA16097@lonesome.com> <20150112122652.GA9472@lonesome.com> <54B3BE2C.6030207@sorbs.net> <20150112123241.GB9472@lonesome.com> <54B3C28C.10605@sorbs.net> <20150112130804.GD44537@home.opsec.eu> , <9132c8812ccd3906dd487830a912d00c@ultimatedns.net>, <9f016d9eec43a047bcfbae526367a2c1@ultimatedns.net> In-Reply-To: <9f016d9eec43a047bcfbae526367a2c1@ultimatedns.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 15:24:15 -0000 On 01/12/15 11:46, Chris H wrote: > >> My main complaint with pkg is the persistent misunderstanding that >> binary packages are a direct replacement for ports. >> http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/pkg.html > I'd be inclined to agree here. > > There are some ports that almost demand a local version - apr (Apache Portability Library) being one of them. Currently, I am locking 'apr' so that pkg upgrade does not clobber apr, and this has worked so far. Just an observation. -- Patrick Powell Astart Technologies papowell@astart.com 1530 Jamacha Rd, Suite X Network and System San Diego, CA 92019 Consulting 858-874-6543 FAX 858-751-2435 Web: www.astart.com