From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Sep 4 23:14: 1 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1828537B409 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 23:13:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f856DtX22171; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 00:13:55 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.11.3/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f856Dsh41869; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 00:13:55 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Message-Id: <200109050613.f856Dsh41869@harmony.village.org> To: "Eugene L. Vorokov" Subject: Re: KLD subsystem improvement Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 04 Sep 2001 19:03:32 +0400." <200109041503.f84F3WS57075@bugz.infotecs.ru> References: <200109041503.f84F3WS57075@bugz.infotecs.ru> Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2001 00:13:54 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <200109041503.f84F3WS57075@bugz.infotecs.ru> "Eugene L. Vorokov" writes: : I'm going to implement a small improvement to a KLD system. I want linker : file not to be loaded at all when all modules inside it fail to load for : some reasons. I think that would be logical behaviour. Does anyone think : that such change would break something ? kldload if_ed.ko Would break. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message