From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Jan 30 12:27:31 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id MAA26368 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 30 Jan 1996 12:27:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from s1.GANet.NET (s1.GANet.NET [199.18.201.2]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id MAA26356 for ; Tue, 30 Jan 1996 12:27:27 -0800 (PST) Received: (from ec0@localhost) by s1.GANet.NET (8.6.11/8.6.11) id PAA27032; Tue, 30 Jan 1996 15:26:18 -0500 Date: Tue, 30 Jan 1996 15:26:17 -0500 (EST) From: Eric Chet To: Stefan Esser cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: various questions In-Reply-To: <199601301803.AA01614@Sysiphos> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > The Dirty Tag RAM and write-back cache mode ought to make > more of a difference on a DX4 system. But I doubt you'll > see more than some 5% to 7% speedup. Thanks Stefan I was looking at the wrong numbers. Are there any problems using a Intel DX4(which has write-back L1) on a SP3G with write-back L2 cache? The SP3G is said to have problems, with write-back L1 && L2. Peace, ejc > > Regards, STefan > -- > Stefan Esser, Zentrum fuer Paralleles Rechnen Tel: +49 221 4706021 > Universitaet zu Koeln, Weyertal 80, 50931 Koeln FAX: +49 221 4705160 > ============================================================================== > http://www.zpr.uni-koeln.de/~se >