From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Jan 18 12:25:40 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id MAA17421 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 18 Jan 1995 12:25:40 -0800
Received: from seagull.rtd.com (root@Seagull.rtd.com [198.102.68.2]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id MAA17413 for <freebsd-hackers@freefall.cdrom.com>; Wed, 18 Jan 1995 12:25:38 -0800
Received: (from dgy@localhost) by seagull.rtd.com (8.6.9/8.6.9.1) id NAA17287 for freebsd-hackers@freefall.cdrom.com; Wed, 18 Jan 1995 13:25:24 -0700
From: Don Yuniskis <dgy@seagull.rtd.com>
Message-Id: <199501182025.NAA17287@seagull.rtd.com>
Subject: ingres in 1.1.5.1R
To: freebsd-hackers@freefall.cdrom.com (FreeBSD hackers)
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 1995 13:25:24 -0700 (MST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 358       
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Greetings!
    Has anyone built/used ingres under 1.1.5.1R?  I'm curious as to
why the "gcc 1" prerequisite...  Was this to overcome a bug which
was introduced in a particular gcc 2 (i.e. should it be interpreted
as "DON'T use gcc 2.X.Y") which has/hasn't been "fixed" yet?  Or,
is it that ingres uses some obsoleted "features" of gcc 1?
    Thx, --don