From owner-freebsd-chat Wed May 12 20: 2:27 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from shell.webmaster.com (mail.webmaster.com [209.133.28.73]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 192C414D6D for ; Wed, 12 May 1999 20:02:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from davids@webmaster.com) Received: from whenever ([209.133.29.2]) by shell.webmaster.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-12345L500S10000V35) with SMTP id com; Wed, 12 May 1999 20:02:25 -0700 From: "David Schwartz" To: , "G. Adam Stanislav" Cc: Subject: RE: Richard Stallman came to town Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 20:02:24 -0700 Message-ID: <000001be9ced$06e0a380$021d85d1@whenever.youwant.to> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2377.0 In-Reply-To: <199905130247.WAA11499@cc942873-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0 Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > IMHO, GNU has a place in the world. I personally don't go to the > extreme that _all_ software should be GNU, but I do think that the > existence of GNU or a foundation actively trying to increase the pool > of GNU software is not evil. It's just another choice for people who > write programs. The evil comes from two sources. First, there are programmers who GPL their code without a clear understanding of what they're doing. Second, GNU is not just about voluntarily licensing one's source code under certain terms, it's also about legal changes that aim to eliminate the entire concept of intellectual property. It is my firm belief that the net effect of GNU and the GPL/GLL is to decrease the quality of software and create many 'everybody loses' scenarios. I have personally seen this happen too many times to count. For example, just recently a project I was involved in required a database much like 'gdbm'. There were a few features that we needed that gdbm did not offer, and had we decided to use gdbm, we would gladly have made those enhancements available to the community -- our product is not a database, so there would be no competitive issues. However, gdbm's license was, unfortunately, too restrictive for us. As a result, so we developed an in-house database on top of proprietary base code, the path of least resistance for us. It's not as good as gdbm would have been with our improvements. The community will not benefit from our effort, since even if we wanted to release the database, we don't have the rights to relase the core code we built it on. Everybody loses. This is typical. This is intentional. DS To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message