From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 24 04:05:15 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6F2416A4CE for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 04:05:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail22.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail22.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B41C43D5F for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 04:05:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 10083 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2005 04:05:15 -0000 Received: from server.baldwin.cx ([216.27.160.63]) (envelope-sender )AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 24 Mar 2005 04:05:14 -0000 Received: from [192.168.0.15] (osx.baldwin.cx [192.168.0.15]) (authenticated bits=0) by server.baldwin.cx (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j2O4573F066068; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 23:05:08 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) In-Reply-To: <20050323205841.N37251@sasami.jurai.net> References: <1110800717.1296.19.camel@localhost> <200503231411.46948.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <20050323154642.J37251@sasami.jurai.net> <42421D8D.5060502@elischer.org> <20050323205841.N37251@sasami.jurai.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <77e48641fc04164b4c81cce75c42a38b@FreeBSD.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: John Baldwin Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 23:05:04 -0500 To: "Matthew N. Dodd" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619.2) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=4.2 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on server.baldwin.cx cc: Vladimir Grebenschikov cc: "current@freebsd.org" cc: Julian Elischer cc: freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Reattach/redetect allways connected umass device - is it possible ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 04:05:16 -0000 On Mar 23, 2005, at 9:00 PM, Matthew N. Dodd wrote: > On Wed, 23 Mar 2005, Julian Elischer wrote: >> eject should imply a detach.. >> i.e. I think your patch should call the detach code from the eject >> code. > > Eject is for devices that support removable media. So are flash memory sticks ejectable media from a slot in a laptop that never goes away? Seems like it should be an ejectable media to me. *shrug* -- John Baldwin <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org