From owner-freebsd-security Sun Dec 31 8: 2:54 2000 From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 31 08:02:52 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.via-net-works.net.ar (ns1.via-net-works.net.ar [200.10.100.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71BA537B400; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 08:02:50 -0800 (PST) Received: (from fpscha@localhost) by ns1.via-net-works.net.ar (8.9.3/8.9.3) id NAA23947; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 13:03:36 -0300 (ART) From: Fernando Schapachnik Message-Id: <200012311603.NAA23947@ns1.via-net-works.net.ar> Subject: Re: Proposed modification to ftpd In-Reply-To: <200012300003.eBU03dr93498@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org> "from Brian Somers at Dec 30, 2000 00:03:39 am" To: Brian Somers Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2000 13:03:36 -0300 (ART) Cc: Fernando Schapachnik , Kris Kennaway , security@FreeBSD.ORG Reply-To: Fernando Schapachnik X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL82 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org En un mensaje anterior, Brian Somers escribió: > > Maybe, but that's how wu-ftpd does it. The objetive is to simplify > > migration from it. Anyway, this is a feature that stock FreeBSD ftpd > > does not have and is very usefull if you are doing virtual hosting. > > I'd favour extending the ftpchroot syntax. Assuming it's currently > only legal to have one user per line, we could introduce a second It's not. You can also use @group (which is preferred if you have many virtual users). > (colon-separated) field specifying the start directory. Regards. Fernando P. Schapachnik Administración de la red VIA NET.WORKS ARGENTINA S.A. fschapachnik@vianetworks.com.ar Conmutador: (54-11) 4323-3333 - Soporte: 0810-333-AYUDA To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message