From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Jun 9 06:21:41 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id GAA21834 for isp-outgoing; Mon, 9 Jun 1997 06:21:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from stingray.ivision.co.uk (stingray.ivision.co.uk [194.154.62.72]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id GAA21829 for ; Mon, 9 Jun 1997 06:21:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from stingray.ivision.co.uk [194.154.62.72] by stingray.ivision.co.uk with smtp (Exim 1.62 #1) id 0wb4N6-0002z2-00; Mon, 9 Jun 1997 14:20:32 +0100 Date: Mon, 9 Jun 1997 14:20:32 +0100 (BST) From: Manar Hussain To: Dennis cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ETinc's Bandwidth limiter In-Reply-To: <3.0.32.19970608115227.006b4a24@etinc.com> Message-ID: Organisation: Internet Vision MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >>>Shall we compare a Porsche to a bicycle next? >> >>If the case is that easy to make I'd be interested in seeing it made. > >If you are going a very short distance they will both get you there >eventually. that's crass (a) it again tells me absolutely nothing about why you're product is so much better other than you think it's obvious (b) on seconds thoughts if the best you can do is the equivalent of "going a very short distance they will both get you there eventually" then I wouldn't bother. Manar