From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 12 17:55:30 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C1C41065674 for ; Mon, 12 May 2008 17:55:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5902A8FC0A for ; Mon, 12 May 2008 17:55:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JvcFF-0005to-Lv for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 12 May 2008 17:55:29 +0000 Received: from 151.85-200-10.bkkb.no ([85.200.10.151]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 12 May 2008 17:55:29 +0000 Received: from solskogen by 151.85-200-10.bkkb.no with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 12 May 2008 17:55:29 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Christer Solskogen Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 19:55:13 +0200 Lines: 39 Message-ID: References: <6.0.0.22.2.20080511190114.0264af00@mail.computinginnovations.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 151.85-200-10.bkkb.no User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421) In-Reply-To: Sender: news Subject: Re: arplookup 0.0.0.0 failed: host is not on local network X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 17:55:30 -0000 Christer Solskogen wrote: > Derek Ragona wrote: > >> Sounds like you have 0.0.0.0 configured on an ethernet interface. I >> would check all your systems, and be sure it isn't used. >> > > I checked, and there is no interface with that ip address. But thanks > for the advice. > > OpenBSD box - where 0.0.0.0 is resolving to. > rl0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > lladdr 00:01:c0:03:7c:09 > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex) > status: active > inet6 fe80::201:c0ff:fe03:7c09%rl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 > inet 192.168.0.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255 > > nfe0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 > options=18b > ether 00:18:f3:29:d8:15 > inet 192.168.0.3 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255 > inet 192.168.0.4 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255 > inet 192.168.0.5 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255 > media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseTX ) > status: active > > > (I also have a Mac OX 10.5 which also resolves 0.0.0.0 to 192.168.0.1. > But a windows machine do not resolve 0.0.0.0) > Gah, my bad. the nfe0 interface are not on OpenBSD, but on my FreeBSD box (where this arp-messages shows up) -- chs