From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 20 00:40:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CC36106566C; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 00:40:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yanefbsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f181.google.com (mail-qy0-f181.google.com [209.85.221.181]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF13B8FC0C; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 00:40:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk11 with SMTP id 11so5682340qyk.13 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 17:40:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=UDCdbQL7pxFSgj6BIcuL5QzA7h1+cfM+9+ohqAaX7fg=; b=WWpP5u5gC4QCR9kKXkBsPUn2ELg1gZ1PH6OYkuc01Hetw4THNgiJZFlcb1igw94TYE v6eGvBI+CupJOBRF/raLG330Ry5HcWG5P2oIpuflp7JXxCDF3P2gO0OwJ/VDJu8N0gHv 3XXbyo2r9gQSCiz4AVagzxjyrqA8HEhYiIHhM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=Dsb3262bCWmw29AV46Ex5UQijsXtQcmYbHAJC+vsupbanc19RuhBeE9DwWwXhXY0+f WmGDXnbl4+W72ZmWJw67ShJAI3ffcNJ+Y+qBTWAKNt1tm9Hdc9vgHHConSWv7THZMfxe 2OkWPQpyRuy70bGzQDA5rkWhZcQoO37X+91JA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.28.85 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 17:40:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20100419233858.GC43612@logik.internal.network> References: <20100328163828.1f34e0e7@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <20100420021420.22e22136@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <20100419233858.GC43612@logik.internal.network> Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 17:40:35 -0700 Received: by 10.229.192.10 with SMTP id do10mr2143635qcb.48.1271724036067; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 17:40:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: From: Garrett Cooper To: freebsd-ports@coreland.ath.cx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: stable@freebsd.org, Ion-Mihai Tetcu , questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 00:40:37 -0000 On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 4:38 PM, wrote: > On 2010-04-20 02:14:20, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: >> A switch to use newer GMP version has been committed. >> >> I'm still investigating lang/gnat-gcc44. > > As far as I know, the gnat-gcc44 bootstrap binaries will be > fine as they're bundled with the libgmp library that was used > to build them. Whether gcc builds with the newer libgmp remains > to be seen... As discussed in the QAT emails, it might be related to ccache use on the build cluster graciously donated by ixSystems, and the fact that the cached data is inconsistently distributed across the cluster. I've provided some tips for itetcu to work around this on IRC (basically disable ccache), but it kind of sucks when you run into periodic issues with toolchain variance like this, s.t. building with NO_CACHE=yes is a necessary evil to work through end-to-end build functional issues. Someone else who knows more about ccache could provide a better explanation of what's going on because my ranting about this would only be me talking out of my rear :). More info about ccache with FreeBSD can be found here: http://forums.freebsd.org/archive/index.php/t-174.html Cheers, -Garrett