From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 2 13:42:17 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29C0016A4CE for ; Mon, 2 May 2005 13:42:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [204.156.12.53]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D695143D45 for ; Mon, 2 May 2005 13:42:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BCFF46B06; Mon, 2 May 2005 09:42:16 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 2 May 2005 14:45:24 +0100 (BST) From: Robert Watson X-X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: c0ldbyte In-Reply-To: <20050502123018.U72118@eleanor.us1.wmi.uvac.net> Message-ID: <20050502143619.C87351@fledge.watson.org> References: <007901c54ec0$14bb3e30$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> <001701c54ecc$921546d0$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> <20050502123018.U72118@eleanor.us1.wmi.uvac.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org cc: Steven Hartland cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: 5.4-STABLE corrupting fs on shutdown -p now? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 May 2005 13:42:17 -0000 On Mon, 2 May 2005, c0ldbyte wrote: >> I have a "HDD Post Write Buffer" in the BIOS according to the MB manual >> although the disks aren't connected to the MB controllers they are on RAID >> 5 set off a PCI-X card. Will give it a go tomorrow ( drag the monitor >> back to the rack ). Will this have any performance penalties? I could >> just avoid using shutdown -p but it seems a bit dodgy what its doing. >> If this machine where miles away without remote console it would have >> caused major amounts of pain. > > Why would you use shutdown -p on a remote machine anyway. I could see > possibly a shutdown -r but -p come on. I use it regularly -- for remote boxes that are in someone else's facility, I'd much rather I was the one who powered them off and told them when they were ready to unplug than having them do it. Life is a bit better with the advent of soft power via case power buttons, but still... Robert N M Watson