From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 1 07:01:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AB3916A4CF for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2004 07:01:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from fep04-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com (fep04-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com [66.185.86.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BE2943D41 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2004 07:01:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from desjardins@canada.com) Received: from gateway.lan.daren.ca ([65.49.123.132]) by fep04-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.comESMTP <20040401150029.LOGX163224.fep04-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com@gateway.lan.daren.ca>; Thu, 1 Apr 2004 10:00:29 -0500 Received: from [216.130.212.41] (account daren@daren.ca HELO [216.130.212.41]) by gateway.lan.daren.ca (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 220897; Thu, 01 Apr 2004 10:01:22 -0500 From: Daren Desjardins To: David.E.Tweten@nasa.gov In-Reply-To: <6750.1080782179@gilmore.nas.nasa.gov> References: <6750.1080782179@gilmore.nas.nasa.gov> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1080831688.73454.4.camel@lithium.stabilia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2004 10:01:28 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH LOGIN at fep04-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com from [65.49.123.132] using ID at Thu, 1 Apr 2004 10:00:29 -0500 cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SSH issues with 4.9 stable (key_verify failed for server_host_key) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2004 15:01:39 -0000 > Can any other SSH-equipped machines log into daren.ca using SSH? > Yes. daren.ca is just one of 5 or 6 hosts I tested it on. All of which fail with the same result. > Since this indicates the just-delivered key for daren.ca failed to verify, > I'm wondering whether there might be something wrong with the public > and/or private DSA machine keys on daren.ca. Incidently, does daren.ca > have an RSA machine key pair, or a protocol 1.5 machine key pair? It has an rsa1,rsa2 and dsa2 key pair.