From owner-freebsd-security Fri Sep 17 19:21:37 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from lariat.lariat.org (lariat.lariat.org [206.100.185.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFF14154A8 for ; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 19:21:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: from mustang (IDENT:ppp0.lariat.org@lariat.lariat.org [206.100.185.2]) by lariat.lariat.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA17174; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 20:21:17 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.19990917201820.046f09e0@localhost> X-Sender: brett@localhost X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 20:21:15 -0600 To: Matthew Dillon , Warner Losh From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: BPF on in 3.3-RC GENERIC kernel Cc: Liam Slusser , Kenny Drobnack , "Harry M. Leitzell" , security@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <199909172259.PAA55902@apollo.backplane.com> References: <4.2.0.58.19990917160519.047cc890@localhost> <4.2.0.58.19990916185341.00aaf100@localhost> <199909172208.QAA05554@harmony.village.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 03:59 PM 9/17/99 -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote: > Making a system reasonably secure does not equate to protecting root from > itself. If someone has root, you've lost. Period. It doesn't matter > whether they can modify the system or not, you've still lost. See my article at http://boardwatch.internet.com/mag/98/dec/bwm62.html regarding why this is ungood. --Brett To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message