From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 31 16:23:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C72BD106564A; Sun, 31 May 2009 16:23:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from itetcu@FreeBSD.org) Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (it.buh.tecnik93.com [81.196.204.98]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E5DF8FC13; Sun, 31 May 2009 16:23:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from itetcu@FreeBSD.org) Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by it.buh.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A41402C50D09; Sun, 31 May 2009 19:24:00 +0300 (EEST) Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 19:24:00 +0300 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: Alexander Leidinger Message-ID: <20090531192400.0a78e56c@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <20090531105110.0000391a@unknown> References: <20090529114800.E8CF08FC50@release.ixsystems.com> <20090531105110.0000391a@unknown> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.1 (GTK+ 2.16.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/mMfWIC9WDJSUlz05PeWCbk7"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org, QAT@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: emulators/linux_base-fc4 - fails: mtree X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 16:23:33 -0000 --Sig_/mMfWIC9WDJSUlz05PeWCbk7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 31 May 2009 10:51:10 +0200 Alexander Leidinger wrote: > On Fri, 29 May 2009 04:48:00 -0700 (PDT) QAT@FreeBSD.org wrote: >=20 >=20 > > The Restless Daemon identified a mtree error while trying to build: > > linux_base-fc-4_14 maintained by freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org > > Makefile ident: $FreeBSD: ports/emulators/linux_base-fc4/Makefile,v > > 1.32 2009/01/21 16:17:46 bsam Exp $ THIS A BUILD WITH CUSTOM PREFIX > > AND LOCALBASE, _standard_ env in rest. >=20 > I'm not sure what to expect from a non-default PREFIX and LOCALBASE > for a linux_base port... Me neither. =20 > The PREFIX of such a port is for sure not equal to LOCALBASE like for > other ports. And if there's a mtree error, then I'm not surprised, as > LOCALBASE (=3D mtree base) is unequal to LINUXBASE (=3D PREFIX in the > default case). If USE_LINUX_PREFIX=3Dyes PREFIX defaults to LINUXBASE (/compat/linux); and it makes sense not to install them since ports in case PREFIX=3DLOCALBASE since it has very good chances to overwrite files with the same name installed by native ports. So I think that if PREFIX=3DLOCALBASE all USE_LINUX_PREFIX ports should be marked broken. > Maybe the QA box needs to not take care about ports which install into > LINUXBASE (or special case to non-default PREFIX=3DLINUXBASE). I'm soooo reluctant to drop any port from checks ;-) I'll try to find some way, I don't want to exclude all ports that depend on linux_base from the run. --=20 IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" FreeBSD committer -> itetcu@FreeBSD.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B --Sig_/mMfWIC9WDJSUlz05PeWCbk7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkoiryAACgkQJ7GIuiH/oeVKTwCgnnEy0OIzEW1BmTM7ootIIzcP LHEAoKE10xn9v0x1uXl0fth2zaNnNO31 =kzSZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/mMfWIC9WDJSUlz05PeWCbk7--