From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 18 19:59:32 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3888B37B401; Mon, 18 Aug 2003 19:59:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailman.zeta.org.au (mailman.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 241A243FA3; Mon, 18 Aug 2003 19:59:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bde@zeta.org.au) Received: from gamplex.bde.org (katana.zip.com.au [61.8.7.246]) by mailman.zeta.org.au (8.9.3p2/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA02870; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 12:59:19 +1000 Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 12:59:18 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans X-X-Sender: bde@gamplex.bde.org To: "David O'Brien" In-Reply-To: <20030818150756.GA63211@dragon.nuxi.com> Message-ID: <20030819124646.T86332@gamplex.bde.org> References: <200308180036.h7I0aVFl033156@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030818150756.GA63211@dragon.nuxi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: Shin-ichi Yoshimoto Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc Makefile src/etc/isdn Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 02:59:32 -0000 On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, David O'Brien wrote: > On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 01:33:32PM +0900, Shin-ichi Yoshimoto wrote: > > Subject: cvs commit: src/etc Makefile src/etc/isdn Makefile, > > On Sun, 17 Aug 2003 17:36:31 -0700 (PDT), David E. O'Brien wrote: > > > 1.10 +4 -2 src/etc/isdn/Makefile > > > > You forgot ".include " > > Eeek, will fix. But why not include instead? Because is (mostly) an implementation detail. Anyway, isdn/Makefile would need if it were a BSD makefile. Most of this bug suite is caused by isdn/Makefile using home made (and wrong) install rules. isdn/Makefile should look much like rc.d/Makefile (with FILES, etc.) except it shouldn't have the style bug of including . There are a few other Makefile that include directly. This seems to be just a style bug except in src/Makefile.inc1. Bruce