From owner-freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 17 21:48:14 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F530833; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 21:48:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A2A58FC13; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 21:48:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-bk0-f54.google.com with SMTP id je9so746518bkc.13 for ; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 13:48:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=zVm6H1t6+8pxu6Rn839ytG3Zuz6aGPPx7U0hDdKh1L8=; b=MEIITNZTx9aiexLQ4ng+Kg0bVo+CBtW+dyZfHsRcqpwa603nJeifjbhlS2drIjqmLi lmj4HClW1NRj8ho0nZhW9NI/NJvsJB0+s8F5e0jhtTd03lQ7HSfadxglTJLf4QZq4MB9 t7kx+0Tu5khdzfoBYNaGzz5cayJ5yEFVlbkFfAa3KRAtaW8uVPsCEWN7mW8mZi+ATFAW mX46qmoQ8cfwPiqrrBgZ8c/BTuENZTuL/bT7vlluIIhhqnKbxrP+TrIL5BnjVsmBr5YO KNcqn41BzS4ULkQApvjNEYs59qdUWs18/RV8H+s9eRTQtRaVQp/m7UfkuLiEzJB50Kil 3jTA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.147.212 with SMTP id m20mr3357386bkv.103.1353188891384; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 13:48:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.50.197 with HTTP; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 13:48:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.50.197 with HTTP; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 13:48:11 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20121117221143.41c29ba2@nonamehost> Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 21:48:11 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FreeBSD needs Git to ensure repo integrity [was: 2012 incident] From: Chris Rees To: Michael Ross Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: Ivan Klymenko , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-security@freebsd.org, grarpamp X-BeenThere: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "FreeBSD Distributions Hubs: mail sup ftp" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 21:48:15 -0000 On 17 Nov 2012 21:00, "Michael Ross" wrote: > > On Sat, 17 Nov 2012 21:11:43 +0100, Ivan Klymenko wrote: > >> =D0=92 Sat, 17 Nov 2012 15:00:06 -0500 >> grarpamp =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: >> >>> http://www.freebsd.org/news/2012-compromise.html >>> http://it.slashdot.org/story/12/11/17/143219/freebsd-project-discloses-secu= rity-breach-via-stolen-ssh-key >>> >>> This is not about this incident, but about why major opensource >>> projects need to be using a repository that has traceable, verifiable, >>> built-in cryptographic authentication. >>> > >> LOL And how will this help Linux? >> http://lwn.net/Articles/457142/ > > > In the first comment on the article you link to, you find this: > > http://www.linux.com/news/featured-blogs/171-jonathan-corbet/491001-the-cra= cking-of-kernelorg > > where the OPs view is susbstantiated. Yes, but git doesn't work with our workflow. It's been discussed several times, and changing to a tool that doesn't work for us (and is GPL btw) is no good at all. Chris