From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 2 01:37:46 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 186FB604; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 01:37:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zoom.lafn.org (zoom.lafn.org [108.92.93.123]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1A20AEA; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 01:37:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.1.2] (static-71-177-216-148.lsanca.fios.verizon.net [71.177.216.148]) (authenticated bits=0) by zoom.lafn.org (8.14.7/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t321bb3H030636 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 1 Apr 2015 18:37:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\)) Subject: Re: Pourdriere produces faulty build results due to bsd.openssl.mk bug From: Doug Hardie In-Reply-To: <551C616C.8080503@rawbw.com> Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 18:37:37 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <551C5C4C.5090707@rawbw.com> <551C6051.4060803@FreeBSD.org> <551C616C.8080503@rawbw.com> To: Yuri X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98 at zoom.lafn.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: "ports@freebsd.org" , Dirk Meyer , Jung-uk Kim , Bryan Drewery X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 01:37:46 -0000 > On 1 April 2015, at 14:21, Yuri wrote: >=20 > On 04/01/2015 14:17, Jung-uk Kim wrote: >> I know bsd.openssl.mk has been broken for very long time. For = example, >>=20 >> http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50108FEF.3030405 >>=20 >> However, I am not sure whether entirely removing it is the best way >> going forward. >=20 > I mean, removing of the dependency on base. Ports should use only = openssl port. >=20 > If you think this isn't a good idea, and ports should still = occasionally use base openssl, would you care to explain why you think = so? >=20 > Yuri Some of us don=E2=80=99t use the ports version of openssl because of the = issues with v1.xxx. =20=