From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 15:18:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C37F16A4CE for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 15:18:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp01.syd.iprimus.net.au (smtp01.syd.iprimus.net.au [210.50.30.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA92943D53 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2004 15:18:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kaiwai@vfemail.net) Received: from [210.50.172.9] (210.50.172.9) by smtp01.syd.iprimus.net.au (7.0.028) id 40DFDEEE00128832 for x11@freebsd.org; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 01:18:14 +1000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.4.030702.0 Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 01:18:18 +1000 From: Matthew Gardiner To: Message-ID: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: Suggestion for xorg X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 15:18:55 -0000 I've just be shuffling through the old xorg-libraries, and have tweaked it so that the DRI modules are created along with the rest of the libraries; no problems so far. This is where I come to my second part, and that is, is there any value in breaking the libraries into MESA and DRI? Why not just include DRI as part of xorg-libraries and make life easier for all concerned? Awaiting any suggestions/flames/replies. Matty