From owner-freebsd-alpha Mon Mar 12 10:28: 8 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from hermes.research.kpn.com (hermes.research.kpn.com [139.63.192.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36D2537B719 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 10:28:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from K.J.Koster@kpn.com) Received: from l04.research.kpn.com (l04.research.kpn.com [139.63.192.204]) by research.kpn.com (PMDF V5.2-31 #42699) with ESMTP id <01K14CQ4OZ22000JHE@research.kpn.com> for freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 19:27:56 +0100 Received: by l04.research.kpn.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 19:26:05 +0100 Content-return: allowed Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 19:21:19 +0100 From: "Koster, K.J." Subject: RE: Syslog reports weird things To: "'leclercn@videotron.ca'" Cc: freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Message-id: <59063B5B4D98D311BC0D0001FA7E452205FD9A4F@l04.research.kpn.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Dear Normand, > > On FreeBSD 4.3-BETA, I get some weird reports from syslog about the > kernel. It seems like the console's output is interpreted in the > log... For example, when I use sysinstall, I get a whole bunch ansi > codes reported to the the console. When I compile, I get some weird > messages that looks like compilation commands from the makefiles and > sometimes, I get junk ascii codes.. I even get those > messages when I'm in vi! > Hmm. You mean like this? http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=24663 I am in the process of trying (and failing *sigh*) to build the world to try and reproduce this. Someone suggested that by doing installworld properly (i.e. do installworld in single user mode) this problem can be fixed. Which brings me to a related point: as I understand UNIX file system semantics, when I overwrite a file by moving another one into its place (say, a lib*.* during installworld) the old file is still available to those processes that had it open already and that new calls to open() will return the new file instead of the old one. So, what difference does it make if I do installworld in single user mode? In order to installworld I have to mount all filesystems, including the NFS ones that hold /usr/src and /usr/obj. Apart from ntpd and sshd single user mode looks the same way as multiusermode. What part of the install would not work in multiuser mode? Kees Jan ================================================ You are only young once, but you can stay immature all your life. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message