From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Nov 19 9:20: 9 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ns.clientlogic.com (ns.clientlogic.com [207.51.66.75]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B00714CE0; Fri, 19 Nov 1999 09:19:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ChrisMic@clientlogic.com) Received: by site0s1 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Fri, 19 Nov 1999 12:19:59 -0500 Message-ID: <6C37EE640B78D2118D2F00A0C90FCB4401105D9E@site2s1> From: Christopher Michaels To: "FreeBSD Questions (E-mail)" Subject: Bind in a sandbox (was: Anticipated release date for 3.4) Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 12:19:58 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG After reading that I was hoping someone could give me some assistance. I would like to run bind in a sandbox. My problem is that I am on a dynamic IP and when I run it in a sandbox, it complains about not being able to bind to port 53 for the new address on the interface. Does anyone know of a way around this? (does bind need to listen to port 53 on the outside interface)? Thanks, -Chris > -----Original Message----- > From: Mike Harding [SMTP:mvh@ix.netcom.com] > Sent: Thursday, November 18, 1999 11:41 PM > To: jkh@zippy.cdrom.com > Cc: mike@sentex.net; jkh@zippy.cdrom.com; stable@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: Re: Anticipated release date for 3.4 > > > Did you read the isc release about what the latest patches fix? > Pretty scary... > > Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" , stable@FreeBSD.ORG > Date: Thu, 18 Nov 1999 15:09:11 -0800 > From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" > Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG > X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Precedence: bulk > X-RULES: lists > > > I also vote for the new BIND if at all possible. But that hasnt even > made > > it into CURRENT yet. > > That disqualifies it pretty significantly then. :) > > - Jordan > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message