From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 3 11:28:08 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CE36106564A for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 11:28:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tingox@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vx0-f182.google.com (mail-vx0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C98EE8FC08 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 11:28:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vxc34 with SMTP id 34so1814658vxc.13 for ; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 04:28:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=94FhVByejL+MMO9ApuRQYtIOLhV3iLN7MmyZ4yjoakA=; b=LeT1cuSagpRFBilRclXU1A68vquo24OFCJzZIK7OoApWHOth++iChzj5IwovJUDZ22 5hiqRyc9kHvsVjoqnU4RMFPfGT4lJC/je2S1FH4X5FQUpXOarH3BA9XctQp7AZXkzS/6 UuGJosefBoz82HrJdSAS68oTth7LRYFH5Y2gA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=p8YZIGfgfL/6D5nB/tNXYxUSIUTP+d9yc8cuzewHvszxON5dNXV7OaYEcJ8Zff1OQi i7qGyDKXSIpTbmD6HvePfY8/NB0fircRyaNTQJeRs4JMaZnXX2cNiDAIL91CgNAYjo3i K7l4Fm8k4LTaBt64SIOFIkSlONpfNNF9CjNxY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.100.136 with SMTP id ey8mr2363200vdb.136.1307098906112; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 04:01:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.110.98 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 04:01:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20110603001251.GA66356@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <20110603065653.GB65291@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 13:01:46 +0200 Message-ID: From: Torfinn Ingolfsen To: Rugxulo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: GPC 2006 (Pascal) -- deprecated or "expired"?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 11:28:08 -0000 Hi, On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Rugxulo wrote: > > Seriously, what maintenance? All someone has to do is build it. Okay, > maybe I'm oversimplifying it, but it can't be much more than that. I > don't expect bugfixes or added features, just a working binary. Well, if it is that simple, why don't you do it? You seem to have enough energy and time to write many messages about this issue. Do you have the time to fix and maintain the port? If you don't, nobody will, because nobody else has stepped up and declared an interest. > Who decided to remove the old one?? Clearly they didn't even know The people who do the work; those who keep our ports tree in working order. (For which I am very grateful, BTW) Now, what is your contribution? (In my book, pointing out a problem isn't a contribution) -- Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen