From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Apr 20 09:30:41 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id JAA29241 for stable-outgoing; Sun, 20 Apr 1997 09:30:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tok.qiv.com ([204.214.141.211]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA29236 for ; Sun, 20 Apr 1997 09:30:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by tok.qiv.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with UUCP id LAA26244; Sun, 20 Apr 1997 11:30:32 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (jdn@localhost) by acp.qiv.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id KAA00326; Sun, 20 Apr 1997 10:54:27 -0500 (CDT) X-Authentication-Warning: acp.qiv.com: jdn owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 20 Apr 1997 10:54:27 -0500 (CDT) From: "Jay D. Nelson" To: Masaya Kinoshita cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is there a perceived need for a 2.1.8 release? In-Reply-To: <199704201425.XAA00204@fmv.mitsumine.co.jp> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-stable@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Actually, I'm inclined to agree. If Walnut Creek doesn't wan't additional inventory, why not scrap the live filesystem on disk 2 and deliver 2.1.x instead? -- Jay On Sun, 20 Apr 1997, Masaya Kinoshita wrote: ->Hello ! -> ->I can't speak ( and write ) English. Sorry! -> ->I like 2.1-stable branch. -> ->It thinks that I want 2.1.8 as one complete type of FreeBSD. -> ->It thinks that it surely becomes the base of my work for any year from ->now. Therefore, it is Freeze on the media, the CD-ROM, if made It thinks ->that it wants to place at hand in the done form. -> ->I therefore already It ordered 2.1.x(Subscription). -> ->We were discourteously. -> -> Masaya Kinoshita (PXI14346@niftyserve.or.jp ) -> (mkino@po.iijnet.or.jp ) ->