From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Jan 2 8:54:30 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4D9837B401; Thu, 2 Jan 2003 08:54:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from level.uwaterloo.ca (level.uwaterloo.ca [129.97.50.219]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D25DF43EC2; Thu, 2 Jan 2003 08:54:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bruce@engmail.uwaterloo.ca) Received: from level.uwaterloo.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by level.uwaterloo.ca (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h02Gr45n068856; Thu, 2 Jan 2003 11:53:04 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from bruce@engmail.uwaterloo.ca) Received: (from www@localhost) by level.uwaterloo.ca (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id h02Gr4U4068855; Thu, 2 Jan 2003 11:53:04 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: level.uwaterloo.ca: www set sender to bruce@engmail.uwaterloo.ca using -f Received: from 129.97.50.50 ( [129.97.50.50]) as user bruce@engmail.uwaterloo.ca by www.nexusmail.uwaterloo.ca with HTTP; Thu, 2 Jan 2003 11:53:04 -0500 Message-ID: <1041526384.3e146e708b8e4@www.nexusmail.uwaterloo.ca> Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 11:53:04 -0500 From: Bruce Campbell To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Followup to "fallback to PIO mode" on dual processor AMD systems References: <1041368236.3e1204ac45da5@www.nexusmail.uwaterloo.ca> <025701c2b112$ddfbf580$1200a8c0@gsicomp.on.ca> <5.2.0.9.0.20030101100848.024838f0@192.168.0.12> In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.0.20030101100848.024838f0@192.168.0.12> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.1 / FreeBSD-4.6.2 X-Originating-IP: 129.97.50.50 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG By the way, I've determined our removable IDE disk trays are manufactured by SNT (http://www.snt.com.tw/metal.htm) and are part number SNT-129. It looks like these are the same ones startech sells. I've placed my hardware configuration here: http://www.freebsd.uwaterloo.ca/twiki/bin/view/Freebsd/DualAmd2000 Out of my 4 AMD systems, my test results are now: - 1 refuses to die - 1 panic'ed and died, after not being able to drop to PIO. Many fsck errors upon reboot. The console error was "ata0: resetting devices .. ad0: DMA limited to UDMA33, non-ATA66 cable or device" - 2 dropped to PIO after about 15 hours of tests, and ran fine (but slowly) with PIO As for the the 2 that dropped to PIO and worked, I rebooted and manually ran atacontrol mode 0 UDMA33 UDMA33 and restarted the tests. No problems in 36 hours so far. My 4 Intel systems (which only have a UDMA33 controller on the motherboard) have also been running 48 hours no problems. The test I run is... dbench 1 sleep 300 dbench 2 sleep 300 dbench 3 ... up to about "dbench 80" and then I kill and restart. With UDMA100, "dbench 10" gave 43 MB/Sec With UDMA33, "dbench 10" gives 37 MB/Sec I still plan to: - try UDMA100 with the drives directly attached (ie. no removable tray) - maybe try a non onboard IDE controller - shuffle the disks to see if the problems follow the disks or not At present, I don't suspect bad media because the error message is "WRITE command timeout tag=0 serv=0" which doesn't suggest a specific sector/track etc, and running with UDMA33 instead of UDMA100 makes the problem appear to vanish. ---------------------------------------- This mail sent through www.mywaterloo.ca To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message