From owner-freebsd-chromium@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 15:06:23 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chromium@FreebSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2206D57C for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 15:06:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D305CD6A for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 15:06:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YBPWN-0000TS-Qg for freebsd-chromium@FreebSD.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 16:06:11 +0100 Received: from firewall.andxor.it ([78.134.40.49]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 16:06:11 +0100 Received: from lapo by firewall.andxor.it with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 16:06:11 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-chromium@FreebSD.org From: Lapo Luchini Subject: Latest Chromium with NPAPI and Hangout support Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 16:05:59 +0100 Lines: 11 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: firewall.andxor.it User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:34.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/34.0 SeaMonkey/2.31 OpenPGP: id=CBDA71F0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-chromium@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Chromium issues List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 15:06:23 -0000 ...is release 35.0.1916.153 and just in case anybody else is interested in using it, I'm keeping a copy of the Port working here: https://github.com/lapo-luchini/FreeBSD-Ports/tree/master/www/chromium I don't really understand the choice to remove NPAPI when Java still hasn't any alternative to it; plugins may be "bad", but sometimes they're just a necessity (Flash too, unfortunately). -- Lapo Luchini - http://lapo.it/