From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Nov 29 03:34:01 2011
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBF88106564A;
	Tue, 29 Nov 2011 03:34:01 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: from mail.soaustin.net (pancho.soaustin.net [76.74.250.40])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB2DD8FC13;
	Tue, 29 Nov 2011 03:34:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502)
	id 228925615B; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 21:34:01 -0600 (CST)
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 21:34:01 -0600
From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org
Message-ID: <20111129033401.GA11234@lonesome.com>
References: <201111281622.pASGMV6L052569@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<20111129014942.GB3706@magic.hamla.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20111129014942.GB3706@magic.hamla.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Cc: Michael Scheidell <scheidell@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org,
	ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net-mgmt/flow-tools Makefile
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree
	<cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 03:34:02 -0000

On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 08:49:42PM -0500, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> >   Submitted by:   fw@moov.de
> >   Reviewed by:    scheidell
> >   Approved by:    maintainer (fw@moov.de, timeout), gabor (mentor)
> 
> What is the rationale for placing the submitter's name in the maintainer
> timeout 'Approved by:' tag? 

fwiw, portsmon looks for "maintainer.timeout" to help it track such
things, so I'd prefer to see "fw@moov.de (maintainer timeout)".

It's just advisory, of course, but every little bit helps.

Thanks.

mcl