From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 29 15:59:08 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0FCD1065672 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 15:59:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from ex-vmail03.lnh.mail.rcn.net (vmail03.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.113]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A07338FC16 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 15:59:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mr17.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.37]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 29 Jun 2011 11:59:07 -0400 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr17.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 4.2.3-GA) with ESMTP id AYO94265; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:59:07 -0400 Received-SPF: None identity=pra; client-ip=209.6.91.204; receiver=smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net; envelope-from="roberthuff@rcn.com"; x-sender="roberthuff@rcn.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.6.91.204; receiver=smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net; envelope-from="roberthuff@rcn.com"; x-sender="roberthuff@rcn.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None identity=helo; client-ip=209.6.91.204; receiver=smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net; envelope-from="roberthuff@rcn.com"; x-sender="postmaster@jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received: from 209-6-91-204.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.91.204]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 29 Jun 2011 11:59:07 -0400 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <19979.19402.879005.607563@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:59:06 -0400 To: Gary Gatten In-Reply-To: <841_1309361265_4E0B4471_841_3565_1_D9B37353831173459FDAA836D3B43499C2309C85@WADPMBXV0.waddell.com> References: <20110629073105.17922wqmo8yonl6o@econet.encontacto.net> <841_1309361265_4E0B4471_841_3565_1_D9B37353831173459FDAA836D3B43499C2309C85@WADPMBXV0.waddell.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr17.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Cc: freebsd-questions , 'eculp' Subject: RE: Opinion on using AMD Phenom II x6 1090t with Gigabyte 890BPA-UD3H and 8GB DDR-3 as a WebServer. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 15:59:09 -0000 Gary Gatten writes: > Yes, generally speaking "more" of something is always better, in > fact our government seems to think more debt is better than less. > However, if you're web apps only need xGB of RAM and y MIPS; what > benefit is it to have n * x RAM and n * y MIPS? It is my understanding surplus RAM will be allocated to file-caching. Whether this benefits your particular application set I would have no idea. Respectfully, Robert Huff