From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Oct 12 23:43:56 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05D0916A4CE
	for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 23:43:56 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D779E43D2F
	for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 23:43:55 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502)
	id 7904C148D9; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 18:43:55 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 18:43:55 -0500 (CDT)
From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
X-X-Sender: linimon@pancho
To: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com>
In-Reply-To: <B06C0FC0-1CA6-11D9-A5A5-00039312D914@fillmore-labs.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0410121843030.2317-100000@pancho>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: FreeBSD ports <ports@FreeBSD.org>
cc: Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com>
cc: Steven Hartland <killing@multiplay.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Email nagging, was: Re: Ports with version numbers
	goingbackwards: graphics/gd,japanese/gd, ukrain...
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 23:43:56 -0000

On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, Oliver Eikemeier wrote:

> Uhm, I wonder why you are fine with hourly `INDEX build failed' 
> messages, but oppose those addressing PORTVERSION. Any crucial 
> difference I'm missing?

N ports vs M ports, N >> M.

mcl