From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 29 10:12:04 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62600DD; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 10:12:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36CDD1482; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 10:12:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.22] (unknown [130.255.19.191]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CA9343552; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 05:11:45 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <540051CF.7000301@marino.st> Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 12:11:27 +0200 From: John Marino Reply-To: marino@freebsd.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dmitry Marakasov , Tijl Coosemans Subject: Re: svn commit: r366349 - head/archivers/rpm4 References: <201408272042.s7RKgFqF074882@svn.freebsd.org> <20140828101134.6f7b01ee@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <20140828102214.GH34677@hades.panopticon> <20140828142822.73c5cef4@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <20140829100025.GQ55025@hades.panopticon> In-Reply-To: <20140829100025.GQ55025@hades.panopticon> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 10:12:04 -0000 On 8/29/2014 12:00, Dmitry Marakasov wrote: > * Tijl Coosemans (tijl@FreeBSD.org) wrote: > >> Does it test with a non-default prefix maybe? Because these directories >> really are in lang/python27/pkg-plist. It would at least have to be >> dirrmtry here, because other ports install files in those directories. > > Strange, poudriere doesn't complain on these any more (no, I haven't > used non-default prefix). So I've removed them. > > And yes, @dirrmtry should've been used here. Regarding directories > shared by multiple ports, I still don't have clear understanding: > on one hand, if a directory is managed by dependency, it shouldn't > appear in the port plist. On the other hand, if a port is installed > with non-default prefix, it should manage all dirs it uses on its > own. I probably would prefer the latter as it's more flexible and > less error prone (what if dependent ports plist change and directory > is no longer shared). if the directory is provided by a dependency 100% of the cases, then it shouldn't be in pkg-plist because it will try-fail 100% of the time. The non-standard prefix isn't an issue because all ports will have the same non-standard prefix. There's no difference. John