From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 8 01:13:58 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF38E106564A for ; Wed, 8 Feb 2012 01:13:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from svyatoslav.lempert@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64D628FC16 for ; Wed, 8 Feb 2012 01:13:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lagz14 with SMTP id z14so50638lag.13 for ; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:13:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=paD9fmvgm9pWPUv4KormKcP6IxexnkuvQkYrvLsF6nc=; b=YpnVPteppWLrx4kkEb1ROXZJBdItrO53pBbn1aerQ/A5pBKqGwABp5/T7QEMCdgZs5 MGTXFmRF6lm+vt3vH2OumnVANgjS5sZ43Trqo2LrwxscOxC37bERStpyctpEW3cxc6xp 97lz6VgIQ6Ihkjh1Z/dG9Y9cFnBrd23flS/kA= Received: by 10.112.85.233 with SMTP id k9mr7206757lbz.56.1328663636483; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:13:56 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.76.163 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Feb 2012 17:13:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201202070829.q178TNZw081740@portsmonj.FreeBSD.org> References: <201202070829.q178TNZw081740@portsmonj.FreeBSD.org> From: Svyatoslav Lempert Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 10:13:36 +0900 Message-ID: To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: FreeBSD ports which are currently scheduled for deletion X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 01:13:58 -0000 2012/2/7 : > The ports, and the reason and date that they have been scheduled > for removal, are listed below. =C2=A0If no one has stepped forward before > that time to propose a way to fix the problems (such as via a PR), > the ports will be deleted. > > portname: =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 lang/php52 > description: =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0PHP Scripting Language > maintainer: =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 admin@lissyara.su > deprecated because: PHP 5.2 series is not supported anymore, migrate now > expiration date: =C2=A0 =C2=A02012-03-01 > build errors: =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 none. > overview: =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/= portoverview.py?category=3Dlang&portname=3Dphp52 > Why so much wish to remove lang/php52? This release is distributed as in the oldstable at http://php.net/downloads.php without restriction. Much more than the right idea to remove lang/php4 it is an older version without any support in other OS (such as Debian or RHEL) and PHP4 should be in a museum! I moved a lot of old sites with PHP4 to PHP 5.2 and I had no problems with them either, because there is compatibility. And it was not necessary to edit the code. Do not break the Web. Versions 5.2 and 5.3 are not compatible. Really. =C2=A0Support for 5.2 is required. Bugs are everywhere. But the patches come out. RHEL and Debian oldstable release them like a few days ago for critical vulnerabilities. Take a look and tell me what PR/164849 is not good. Because we can also distribute patches inside of ports as separate files or change any other. Think about it? Why so much hatred for lang/php52? --=20 Svyatoslav