From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 30 00:01:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 586B416A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 00:01:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from priv-edtnes57.telusplanet.net (defout.telus.net [199.185.220.240]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF84143D2F for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 00:01:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cpressey@catseye.mine.nu) Received: from catseye.biscuit.boo ([207.81.17.215]) by priv-edtnes57.telusplanet.netSMTP <20040130080155.QTVB28240.priv-edtnes57.telusplanet.net@catseye.biscuit.boo>; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 01:01:55 -0700 Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 00:06:10 -0800 From: Chris Pressey To: "Paul A. Hoadley" Message-Id: <20040130000610.3809be06.cpressey@catseye.mine.nu> In-Reply-To: <20040130070435.GA12066@grover.logicsquad.net> References: <20040130065605.9623.qmail@web12907.mail.yahoo.com> <20040130070435.GA12066@grover.logicsquad.net> Organization: Cat's Eye Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.8a (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: pldsoftlist@yahoo.com cc: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: about logo X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 08:01:57 -0000 [redirected to freebsd-chat@] On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 17:34:35 +1030 "Paul A. Hoadley" wrote: > On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 10:56:05PM -0800, Bubble Gum wrote: > > > I just want to ask (i'm sorry if it's a silly question),why freebsd > > logo use "devil" character? > > It's not a devil. It's a daemon. > > http://www.freebsd.org/copyright/daemon.html But you have to admit, glib explanations notwithstanding, that our beloved Beastie *is* a devil. I mean, I sincerely doubt that the ancient Greeks envisioned daemons to be red-skinned horned things with pointy tails, carrying pitchforks. Whereas who can dispute that the modern devil image in western culture *does* entail those features? So I feel that there's a certain amount of sophistry in this oft-repeated apologia - and it's beginning to annoy me just a little. Now, if anyone has a *problem* with Beastie being a devil, that's a completely different issue... -Chris