From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 30 01:34:04 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9360B2C7 for ; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 01:34:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx01.cellcontainer.com (mx01.cellcontainer.com [81.0.104.240]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 135E92C23 for ; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 01:34:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx01.cellcontainer.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx01.cellcontainer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF327841 for ; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 01:33:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cellcontainer.com; h= message-id:date:subject:from:to:mime-version:content-type :in-reply-to:references; s=selector1; bh=ExM2b4/j5hIXDs56T7glh2h ZEO4=; b=rdyDGDnK+A3koCeLPogbclH88fsLfgkYOOneOIMghrJdPv0mAUmc67X 6MZKmomzgM/G8cTK3xVFPl5kaZjdP6eJlhrqZvqabV3tJ5IY5sitRHolD5ye3ER+ Rg5n0eVZ+T6xQLjpht3gZS7W1jaQWNgOjshIEFlMkugV6yevPVo4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=cellcontainer.com; h= message-id:date:subject:from:to:mime-version:content-type :in-reply-to:references; q=dns; s=selector1; b=YYBPt6Z0JhjzwvCly +cxPzUCl6JO5BT+/QCjcL2Us8SCHVL42oUQViq8zJJCznh1ON2fC/nMxtKcqW/Pz u9t66NjuHXexz6ZElg2MJUmkgMRVwanlL1LkOHCZuEj6eBW5/K9SkTus0OfbhlZl NTp6hlIHjmcxIPgv56lWeES8VA= Received: from gpo.cellcontainer.com (unknown [10.5.100.101]) by mx01.cellcontainer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE9A4840 for ; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 01:33:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gpo.cellcontainer.com (Postfix, from userid 58) id C2395BC6C5; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 01:33:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gpo.cellcontainer.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gpo.cellcontainer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92CB3BC6B9 for ; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 01:33:54 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1404092034.53b0be828b25c@gpo.cellcontainer.com> Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 13:33:54 +1200 Subject: Re: iocage - drop in jail manager From: Peter Toth To: "freebsd-jail@freebsd.org" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MimeOLE: Produced by Group-Office 3.7.41 In-Reply-To: <53A060D4.1080100@a1poweruser.com> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) References: <53A060D4.1080100@a1poweruser.com> X-Mailer: Group-Office 3.7.41 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18 X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 01:34:04 -0000 Pushed up a new version to github (1.3.1) http://pannon.github.io/io= cage/ . Man page is finished and created WIKI too (will be back-fill= ing pages). The new version supports non-VNET jails too (shared IP b= ased jails). There is a differential jail packaging function as well= as import/export. Many thanks for the feedback from the few who= emailed me. P On Wednesday, 18-06-2014 on 3:37 Fbsd= 8 wrote: Peter Toth wrote: > For anyone interested in ma= naging jails with VNET, ZFS and resource > limits I have created a j= ail manager script > https://github.com/pannon/iocage . Basically re= written most of > "zjails" in pure sh with simplicity in mind. > = > 90% is done final commits will be happening in the next 2 wee= ks. Feel > free to give it a test drive. >=20 Will = this script work on i386 systems? Will this script work on a ge= neric system with no zfs disk area enabled? Does vnet jai= l still have "lost memory bug" when stopping vnet jail? Do an= y of the host firewalls (ie; ipfw, ipf, pf) work on host and in=20 mul= tiple vnet jail at same time? Does NAT function work in vnet jai= l? Can non-vnet jails be created?