From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 3 02:27:43 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD69C16A400; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 02:27:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC06113C43E; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 02:27:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD3701A3C1C; Sat, 2 Jun 2007 19:28:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [192.168.1.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0615C51441; Sat, 2 Jun 2007 22:27:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id E6B7CC06D; Sat, 2 Jun 2007 22:27:42 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 22:27:42 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Doug Barton Message-ID: <20070603022742.GA2886@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <46620099.4080007@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46620099.4080007@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: BIND 9.4.1 imported X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 02:27:43 -0000 On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 04:43:21PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > Howdy, > > After extensive testing, I've upgraded the BIND in the base to version > 9.4.1. This version contains a lot of performance improvements, > especially for threading, so I've re-enabled it by default. The other > most significant thing in this version is improved DNSSEC, which will > of course be of interest to only a few of you (unfortunately). :) > > For the vast majority of users, this should be a noop. Please test, > especially if you have a heavier loaded name server, and report any > issues. Also I'll remark that we remain very interested in getting access to either a busy nameserver or the data stream from one, in order to profile FreeBSD kernel activity and look for places to optimize performance. Kris