From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 15 14:59:26 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B5ED106568D; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:59:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ben@wanderview.com) Received: from mail.wanderview.com (mail.wanderview.com [66.92.166.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 886648FC1B; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:59:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from xykon.in.wanderview.com (xykon.in.wanderview.com [10.76.10.152]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.wanderview.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8FEKIWV011393 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:20:19 GMT (envelope-from ben@wanderview.com) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1075.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes From: Ben Kelly In-Reply-To: <4AAF944F.1040209@errno.com> Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 10:20:18 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <07CC63B9-2303-4AE6-B285-5532F839E660@wanderview.com> References: <200909151134.n8FBYr8F086888@svn.freebsd.org> <4AAF944F.1040209@errno.com> To: Sam Leffler X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1075.2) X-Spam-Score: -1.44 () ALL_TRUSTED X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 10.76.20.1 Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Pawel Jakub Dawidek Subject: Re: svn commit: r197218 - head/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:59:26 -0000 On Sep 15, 2009, at 9:19 AM, Sam Leffler wrote: > Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: >> Author: pjd >> Date: Tue Sep 15 11:34:53 2009 >> New Revision: 197218 >> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/197218 >> Log: >> We believe ZFS is ready for production use. Remove a warning about >> it being >> experimental. :) > > This is great news! Is this amd64 only (or i386 too)? How about > non-x86 architectures (have people tested on sparc64, ppc, etc)? My experience with i386 was that the zfs ARC code caused significant kmem fragmentation. While I have not tested this with recent commits, I haven't seen anything that would lead me to believe its fixed either. I seem to recall Kip said he was working on UMA changes or something like that to address the problem. - Ben