From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 20 17:02:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FAFC16A41F for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 17:02:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz) Received: from eva.fit.vutbr.cz (eva.fit.vutbr.cz [147.229.10.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3D9743D49 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 17:01:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz) Received: from eva.fit.vutbr.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eva.fit.vutbr.cz (envelope-from xdivac02@eva.fit.vutbr.cz) (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jBKH1tMr088431 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 18:01:55 +0100 (CET) Received: (from xdivac02@localhost) by eva.fit.vutbr.cz (8.13.4/8.13.3/Submit) id jBKH1txC088430 for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 18:01:55 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 18:01:55 +0100 From: Divacky Roman To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20051220170155.GA87954@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> References: <43A7BF25.6040901@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.49 on 147.229.10.14 Subject: Re: gcc4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 17:02:00 -0000 On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 05:28:48PM +0800, Xin LI wrote: > Hi, David, > > On 12/20/05, David Xu wrote: > > When will gcc4 be in base tree ? > > Is our tree gcc4-safe already? I have not checked for this for a long time... most of the tree is and the rest is trivial to fix.. havent tried stability thought